On the day after the election, many of us in education may
be wondering what might have been and what will be when it comes to the
presidential impact on schooling. Mr.
Romney’s election may likely have ushered in increases in school choice
programs (especially vouchers and for-profit charter schools) and decreases in
school spending (at least if Mr. Ryan’s budget would have held out). With those changes on the loosing end of the
ballot, should we anticipate more of the same from a second four years of
President Obama? In some ways, yes, I
believe we will see more of the same—for better or worse.
Given Mr. Obama’s emphasis on the need to keep America
competitive in an increasingly technological and knowledge-based global
economy, we will likely see more focus on recruiting and (hopefully) preparing
math and science teachers, which will be backed with government funds. We will likely see continued efforts to
alleviating bullying and the achievement gap in schools, but we will likely see
less federal funding to aid in doing so, especially as the last of the stimulus
money dries up, putting Obama’s major first-term project, Race to the Top, at
risk. And while Race to the Top funding
may cover some of the performance pay plans that the president desires, others
will go unfunded by struggling local districts.
Money may be sought from other sources, however, as I
believe President Obama will continue to celebrate philanthropists and
foundations that sponsor educational innovations. Relatedly, I think President Obama will
continue to applaud the efforts of organizations leading the charter school
movement. If his pattern from the first
term holds, he will likely do so without enough careful scrutiny of the
practices of those schools, especially in terms of how they use public dollars
or meet the needs of poor and minority children with pedagogical styles that
sometimes jeopardize other educational opportunities, like the development of
good citizenship.
I suspect we will also continue to see Secretary Duncan
offering NCLB waivers, despite the fact that these have angered many political
opponents who see them as circumventing the good intentions of the original
law, which had Democratic roots, bipartisan support at the time of signing, and
a Republican legacy. Hopefully this
situation might provoke positive changes and a reauthorization of the overdue
ESEA law during Obama’s second term.
Additionally, I anticipate that Republicans at the state level will
continue to push school voucher and tax credit legislation despite Mr. Obama’s
position against it, as demonstrated by his stance on the D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship Program. Finally, the next
four years will begin to show us the usefulness and effectiveness of the new
Common Core State Standards, an endeavor that Obama’s administration has
supported, sometimes dangling funds in front of leery states in order to get
them on board.
This is what I anticipate.
I welcome hearing from you regarding what you suspect we will see in the
next four years.
Photo credit: Romeo Area Tea Party
1 comment:
My sense is that the organized charter movement will continue to charge ahead with the administration's blessing, which as you indicate is worrisome because of the lack of scrutiny and regulation. I share your take on this matter, but hope to be proven wrong.
Post a Comment